|
Presentations at The Special Session on Quinacrine Nonsurgical Sterilization at XVI FIGO World Congress The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Washington, DC
Six distinguished physicians gave presentations at a Special Session on Quinacrine Nonsurgical Sterilization at the XVI FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Washington, DC September 3-8, 2000 . A time for discussion followed.
Abstracts of the presentations:
Quinacrine Sterilization: Appropriateness for private practice and service programs Mildred A. Hanson, MD Private Practice OB/GYN Minneapolis MN, USA Quinacrine Sterilization Among High Risk Women Ashi R. Sarin, MD Aastha Medical Center Patiala, India Quinacrine Sterilization: Assessment of safety and efficacy Jack Lippes, MD School of Medicine State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, New York, USA Quinacrine Non-Surgical Female Sterilization: Experience in Chile Valentin Trujillo, MD San José Hospital, Santiago, Chile Quinacrine Sterilization: Endometrial assessment by vaginal ultrasonography Cláudia Ramos C. Ferreira, MD Faculdade de Medicina da UFMG Bela Horizonte, Brazil Quinacrine Pellet Nonsurgical Female Sterilization in Bangladesh Syeda Nurjahan Bhuiyan, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Chittagong Medical College Chittagong, Bangladesh   |

Quinacrine Sterilization: Appropriateness for private practice and service programs M. Hanson Private Practice OB/GYN Minneapolis MN, USA |  |  |
 Objectives To assess risks and benefits of quinacrine sterilization (QS), a nonsurgical method for women. Study Methods Literature review, including www.quinacrine.com, of QS, which involves transcervical application of quinacrine 252 mg in the pro- liferative phase of two consecutive menstrual cycles. This is compared to laparoscopic surgical sterilization in the USA. Results The present protocol for QS shows an estimated pregnancy failure rate of one per 100 women at 2 years of use, which is approximately twice that of surgical sterilization. On the other hand, QS has a much lower incidence of side effects and serious complications and there are no reported case fatalities for QS in over 100,000 cases, whereas for surgical sterilization in industrialized countries, as the USA, the incidence is 3 per 100,000 procedures. Long-term sequelae of QS, such as risk of cancer and birth defects appear to be very remote and ectopic pregnancy risk among pregnancy failures is not higher than for surgical sterilization. Obviously, the cost of QS is lower than for surgical sterilization. Conclusions QS should be an option for any woman who is sure she wants no more children. This method is now appropriate for use in private practice and service programs in the USA, where it is legal for this off label use on prescription filled by compound pharmacists.   |

Quinacrine Sterilization Among High Risk Women A. Sarin Aastha Medical Center Patiala, India |  |  |
 Objectives A nonsurgical method of female sterilization is needed because many women are at high risk of complications for standard surgical methods, especially in developing countries. Also, some women who desire sterilization refuse it for fear of surgery. To meet these special needs, we initiated a trial of quinacrine sterilization (QS). Study Methods A trial of a nonsurgical sterilization method involving transcervical insertion of 252 mg quinacrine as pellets by a modified IUD inserter plus 50 mg of diclofenac in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle was initiated among 134 women requesting sterilization at a medical school family planning clinic. This insertion was repeated a month later and a 150 mg injection of depo medroxyprogesterone was administered at time of the first insertion. Results Among 134 women of reproductive age entering this trial, 92 were considered high risk for surgery, 27 refused surgery and 15 were cases of failed surgical sterilization. Mean follow-up was 3.46 years. No pregnancies or serious complications were experienced. The main side effect was menstrual irregularities, probably due to depo medroxyprogesterone. Conclusions QS is a suitable option for women at high risk of surgical complications.   |

Quinacrine Sterilization: Assessment of safety and efficacy J. Lippes School of Medicine State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, New York, USA |  |  |
 Objectives To assess the safety and efficacy of a method of nonsurgical female sterilization. Study Methods Review of literature, including www.quinacrine.com, and unpublished reports known to the author. Results No deaths have been reported in over 100,000 quinacrine sterilizations performed in 25 countries. Major complications are 1/50th that reported for surgical sterilization. Ectopic pregnancy risk is similar to that following surgical sterilization. Follow-up for 19 years shows no increased risk of cancer. Pregnancy failures are 1 to 2 per 100 women after 2 years of use. Conclusions Quinacrine sterilization should be an option for all well-informed women who desire no more children.   |

Quinacrine Non-Surgical Female Sterilization: Experience in Chile V. Trujillo San José Hospital, Santiago, Chile J. Zipper, University of Chile, Sotero del Rio Hospital, Santiago, Chile A. Dabancens, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile S. Guzman, Regional Hospital of Valdivia, Valdivia, Chile |  |  |
 Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of quinacrine nonsurgical sterilization from experience in 3 hospitals in Chile. Study Methods Clinical data for 2592 Chilean women receiving quinacrine sterilization involving 2 or 3 transcervical insertions of 252 mg quinacrine in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle between 1977 and 1998 in three public hospitals are analyzed. Results For the 2592 women receiving quinacrine sterilization, cumulative life-table pregnancy rates per 100 women at 10 years varied from 5.2 to 6.9. The addition of intrauterine antiprostaglandins as adjuvants did not affect these rates. Physicians and midwives showed similar efficacy. No birth defects among pregnancies carried to term were detected. There were 9 ectopic pregnancies (0.34%) among a total of 119 pregnancy failures, which is similar to our experience with IUDs and lower than for surgical sterilization. There were no life threatening complications and side effects were mild and transient. Conclusions Quinacrine sterilization is a safe option for women who are sure they desire no more children.   |

Quinacrine Sterilization: Endometrial assessment by vaginal ultrasonography C.R.C. Ferreira D.R.B. Magalhaes M.Z. Hanan D.C. Ferreira Faculdade de Medicina da UFMG Bela Horizonte, Brazil |  |  |
 Objectives To observe endometrial thickness before, during and after transcervical administration of quinacrine for nonsurgical sterilization. Study Methods 80 women out of a planned study of 150 women requesting sterilization at the family planning clinic of a medical school hospital in Bela Horizonte, Brazil volunteered to participate in this study. Each received 2 consecutive monthly transcervical insertions of 252 mg quinacrine as pellets delivered by a modified Copper T IUD inserter in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Transvaginal pelvic ultrasono- graphy was performed before, during and after insertions and at each follow-up visit. Results Of 80 subjects admitted in the study, transient side effects were noted as follows: headache 4 cases, light bleeding 12, mild abdominal pain 12, vaginal pruritis - 8, and yellow vaginal discharge for 7 to 10 days 64. No major complications, infections or pregnancy failures were noted. A decrease in endometrial thickness was observed during the first 6 months, which corresponds to incidence of oligomenorrhea. Conclusions Quinacrine sterilization was found safe and acceptable when offered as an option to women requesting sterilization. A decrease in thickness of endomentrium and oligomenorrhea appears to be transient over a 6-month period.   |

Quinacrine Pellet Nonsurgical Female Sterilization in Bangladesh S.N. Bhuiyan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Chittagong Medical College Chittagong, Bangladesh |  |  |
 Objectives To evaluate the efficacy, safety and acceptability of transcervical applications of quinacrine along with adjuvants such as ampicillin or ibuprofen for sterilization. Study Methods Cohort study at a family planning clinic of a tertiary hospital. Seven hundred and fifty normal women who requested sterilization and volunteered for this method were admitted from October 1989 to April 1999. Each women received one or two monthly insertions of 180 mg or 252mg quinacrine with or without adjuvants, ibuprofen 55.5 mg or ampicillin 125mg. Supplementary contraception included oral contraceptive pills, barrier methods or medroxyprogesterone for 3 months. Results The gross pregnancy failure rate for 180mg cases (N-489) was 4.4% compared to 1.5% for 252mg cases (N-261). There were no serious complications and side effects were transient. Conclusions Quinacrine nonsurgical sterilization is a safe and acceptably effective method when two insertion of 252mg quinacrine with medroxyprogesterone for 3 months supplementary contraception are used.
|